An enterprise customer is ready to proceed: your software product has passed the technical evaluation and pricing discussions are complete. Then procurement asks for your latest SOC 2 report. There’s no report to hand over.
For Australian SaaS companies entering larger markets, this situation creates an immediate challenge. Because security assurance takes time, rushing into the wrong assessment may not satisfy the customer’s requirements. Understanding what the buyer expects, and planning backward from the deadline, is where the solution begins.
First, find out exactly what was asked for, and by when, without rushing. Ask before assuming: a request sometimes leaves more room than it first seems to.
Which SOC 2 Report Does the Customer Need?
The level of assurance isn’t the same across every SOC 2 report. The distinction between SOC 2 type 1 vs type 2 matters when responding to enterprise security requirements. At a particular date, Type 1 evaluates whether relevant controls are suitably designed. Their design and operating effectiveness over a defined period are what Type 2 examines.
Type 1 may be accepted temporarily by an enterprise buyer, but many specifically request Type 2, since it provides evidence covering actual operations. Check the report type, required scope, and acceptable reporting dates with the customer before you commission an examination.
Keep a written record of the answers, because the report type, scope, and dates all drive the plan and the budget. If the customer’s requirements are unclear, ask for the exact wording in the contract or the security questionnaire.
Build Your Timeline Around the Observation Period
A SOC 2 type 2 examination cannot be completed simply by preparing documentation and scheduling an auditor. Throughout the reporting period, the organization must operate its relevant controls. An initial examination may cover a period of three months, whereas subsequent reports commonly cover longer ones.
If your business needs to demonstrate access reviews, security training, or change approvals, those activities must occur and be documented during the applicable window. Planning backward from a customer deadline helps identify whether the requested report can realistically be delivered on time.
When the deadline can’t be met within the observation period, say so to the customer early. Interim steps, such as a dated plan, are something some customers will discuss if they hear about the gap early.
What Exactly Are You Paying For?
SOC 2 does not issue certificates, even though businesses frequently search for SOC 2 type 2 certification.
An independent examination against the applicable AICPA Trust Services Criteria is performed by a licensed CPA firm, which issues an attestation report. The report describes the assessed system, relevant controls, testing procedures, and the auditor’s opinion.
That document is what customers typically review, often under a confidentiality agreement. A SOC type 2 report also relates to a specific historical period. It doesn’t automatically give assurance about every change made afterward.
Understand the Costs Before You Begin
An independent examination fee is only part of the cost of SOC 2 preparation. Help may be needed to develop policies, conduct risk assessments, prepare evidence, train employees, and arrange security testing.
Siege Cyber advertises a SOC 2 compliance package for businesses with up to 50 employees, priced at AUD $2,750 per month, excluding GST, over twelve months. Eligible contracts signed by December 31, 2026 are covered by the advertised offer. Its package includes compliance preparation, training, a compliance platform, and external penetration testing.
The independent CPA examination is billed separately; Siege Cyber indicates typical fees of approximately AUD 5,000–15,000, depending on scope and complexity. Before committing, confirm current pricing, eligibility, and deliverables.
Dealing With a Report That Has Aged
Suppose your Type 2 report covers January through June, but a customer requests assurance in October. The report doesn’t look at the months in between. Some customers may accept a management-issued bridge letter describing relevant changes since the reporting period ended.
Acceptance depends on the customer’s requirements, however, and a bridge letter does not replace an independent examination. Rather than assuming an older report will satisfy procurement, discuss reporting gaps early.
Build Compliance That Outlasts One Contract
Siege Cyber provides Australian-based SOC 2 readiness support with fixed-price consulting packages and independent audit coordination. The most useful approach for growing software companies is to connect compliance preparation with actual operational responsibilities.
Assign control owners, maintain security records, and establish a reporting schedule that supports future customer reviews. Rather than simply helping respond to the current request, a successful SOC 2 project should leave your business better prepared for the next enterprise opportunity.
The next audit cycle is less of a scramble when the evidence you collect has been kept organized from the start.
